GATE Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

dMY Squared Technology Group has a net margin of -- compared to Marblegate Acquisition's net margin of --. Marblegate Acquisition's return on equity of -- beat dMY Squared Technology Group's return on equity of --.

Marblegate Acquisition has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand dMY Squared Technology Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Marblegate Acquisition has higher upside potential than dMY Squared Technology Group, analysts believe Marblegate Acquisition is more attractive than dMY Squared Technology Group.

Marblegate Acquisition has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison dMY Squared Technology Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Marblegate Acquisition has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. dMY Squared Technology Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Marblegate Acquisition pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. dMY Squared Technology Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Marblegate Acquisition quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than dMY Squared Technology Group quarterly revenues of --. Marblegate Acquisition's net income of -$565.8K is lower than dMY Squared Technology Group's net income of $145.5K. Notably, Marblegate Acquisition's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while dMY Squared Technology Group's PE ratio is 59.33x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Marblegate Acquisition is -- versus -- for dMY Squared Technology Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Graf Global has a net margin of -- compared to Marblegate Acquisition's net margin of --. Marblegate Acquisition's return on equity of -- beat Graf Global's return on equity of --.

Marblegate Acquisition has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Graf Global has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Marblegate Acquisition has higher upside potential than Graf Global, analysts believe Marblegate Acquisition is more attractive than Graf Global.

Marblegate Acquisition has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Graf Global has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Marblegate Acquisition has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Graf Global offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Marblegate Acquisition pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Graf Global pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Marblegate Acquisition quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Graf Global quarterly revenues of --. Marblegate Acquisition's net income of -$565.8K is lower than Graf Global's net income of $2.5M. Notably, Marblegate Acquisition's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Graf Global's PE ratio is 55.82x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Marblegate Acquisition is -- versus -- for Graf Global. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Legato Merger Corp III has a net margin of -- compared to Marblegate Acquisition's net margin of --. Marblegate Acquisition's return on equity of -- beat Legato Merger Corp III's return on equity of --.

Marblegate Acquisition has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Legato Merger Corp III has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Marblegate Acquisition has higher upside potential than Legato Merger Corp III, analysts believe Marblegate Acquisition is more attractive than Legato Merger Corp III.

Marblegate Acquisition has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Legato Merger Corp III has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Marblegate Acquisition has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Legato Merger Corp III offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Marblegate Acquisition pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Legato Merger Corp III pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Marblegate Acquisition quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Legato Merger Corp III quarterly revenues of --. Marblegate Acquisition's net income of -$565.8K is lower than Legato Merger Corp III's net income of $2.4M. Notably, Marblegate Acquisition's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Legato Merger Corp III's PE ratio is 27.50x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Marblegate Acquisition is -- versus -- for Legato Merger Corp III. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Unusual Machines has a net margin of -- compared to Marblegate Acquisition's net margin of -140.03%. Marblegate Acquisition's return on equity of -- beat Unusual Machines's return on equity of --.

Marblegate Acquisition has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Unusual Machines has an analysts' consensus of $16.00 which suggests that it could grow by 201.32%. Given that Unusual Machines has higher upside potential than Marblegate Acquisition, analysts believe Unusual Machines is more attractive than Marblegate Acquisition.

Marblegate Acquisition has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Unusual Machines has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Marblegate Acquisition has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Unusual Machines offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Marblegate Acquisition pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Unusual Machines pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Marblegate Acquisition quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Unusual Machines quarterly revenues of $1.5M. Marblegate Acquisition's net income of -$565.8K is higher than Unusual Machines's net income of -$2.1M. Notably, Marblegate Acquisition's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Unusual Machines's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Marblegate Acquisition is -- versus 7.94x for Unusual Machines. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.